Avoiding Tenant Risk in Industrial Real Estate
In a given transaction, there are likely multiple players involved. These may include:
The owners/investors – These people are looking for specific returns on their investment
The developers – These people must provide economic returns to to their investment partners while remaining competitive in the market
The property managers – These people must ensure property maintenance for tenants, developers and landlords
The tenants – These people are searching for the most appropriate location for their business without sacrificing operation and budget considerations
When you look at it like this, it’s suddenly clear why tenant goals seem to be in direct competition with those of the property owner or developer. That’s the likely culprit behind tenants taking unnecessary risks.
I’m often approached by tenants seeking advice for a problem. After reviewing the issue and the lease documents and the options at hand, I usually ask the tenant why they agreed to something in their transaction. The answer is usually a variation of the following:
I didn’t know I was agreeing to it.
I didn’t understand that part of the agreement.
I didn’t anticipate this result when I signed the agreement.
I didn’t actually read the lease that closely.
At this point, we’re usually at a major disadvantage. Those concessions may have been unwitting, but they are contractually binding all the same.
Here’s the bottom line. Tenants can avoid the scenario above – and the risk mentioned in the title of this post – simply by remembering that the landlord is an advocate for him/herself and investor partners. Save yourself the frustration and inherent risk of dealing with someone who handles lease negotiations as a matter of course, and find someone who can bring to the table the same skill set. Partnering with an experienced industrial real estate agent is the best way to level the playing field and avoid the major risk most tenants face.